<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Stock Charts &#8211; NFLX, AKS, CROX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thewildinvestor.com/3-stock-charts-nflx-aks-crox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thewildinvestor.com/3-stock-charts-nflx-aks-crox/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of an Entre-vestor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:28:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charting Stocks For Dummies Part 3</title>
		<link>http://thewildinvestor.com/3-stock-charts-nflx-aks-crox/comment-page-1/#comment-8057</link>
		<dc:creator>Charting Stocks For Dummies Part 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewildinvestor.com/?p=5808#comment-8057</guid>
		<description>[...] In the original analysis of Crocs (CROX), we saw that the stock had consolidated under the 50 day moving average (blue line). When the stock initially fell below the line, that should have triggered a sell signal, and now the stock was looking to get back in the buy zone by breaching back over the 50 day moving average; however, the combination of the RSI and MACD in bearish territories just didn&#8217;t seem that convincing. So I predicted this stock would get rejected. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the original analysis of Crocs (CROX), we saw that the stock had consolidated under the 50 day moving average (blue line). When the stock initially fell below the line, that should have triggered a sell signal, and now the stock was looking to get back in the buy zone by breaching back over the 50 day moving average; however, the combination of the RSI and MACD in bearish territories just didn&#8217;t seem that convincing. So I predicted this stock would get rejected. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
